One Mystery Solved
Trader Joe’s is scheduled to open its first Georgia store outside the metro-Atlanta area on Oct. 29 in a 12,100 square-foot storefront in one of three buildings that make up the Markets at Epps Bridge, 1850 Epps Bridge parkway.
The grocery will be just west of Ashley Furniture in space that was designated for Harbor Freight Tools. Harbor Freight Tools now has moved a few doors further west to space that was occupied by Golden Dragon International Buffet, which has closed.
Traders Joe’s will be in Building C in the complex, which is behind Building A, which houses the Five Points Deli, and Building B, where NewBalance and Fox’s Pizza are located.
According to the application for sale of beer and wine that Trader Joe’s filed with Oconee County Clerk Gina Lindsey on Aug. 30, the sales area for the new store will occupy 9,352 square feet of the leased space, with storage taking up most of the rest.
The total square footage for Trader Joe’s at 12,110 compares with the 55,696 square feet occupied by the nearby Kroger grocery.
The diagram for the store submitted with the beer and wine application shows a store with four and a half shopping rows offset slightly and two separate produce rows.
According to the beer and wine license application, no one connected with the business has been convicted of a violation of any state, federal or local alcohol laws in the last 10 years.
The commissioners said how happy they were to have Trader Joe’s coming to the county, and Wofford said how happy he was to be here.
“The reception has been wonderful,” Wofford said. “We feel loved.”
Wofford also said “if there is anything we can do for you, please let us know.”
The offer apparently only extended to Oconee County officials.
On Oct. 1, the day after the Athens Banner-Herald reported that the store would open on Oct. 29, I called Alison Mochizuki, listed in the Banner-Herald as the director of national public relations for Trader Joe’s and the source of the information in the story on the store’s opening date.
When I got an answering machine, I left a message asking Mochizuki to call me. I also called the main switchboard and was told that Mochizuki is the public relations department for the company and that she was the only one who could answer any questions I had.
I found a press release from earlier this year online that listed Mochizuki’s email address, and I sent her an email as well, asking her to call me.
I next called the number in the alcohol license application given for Wofford and also left a message.
By Monday morning, I had heard nothing from Mochizuki or Wofford, so I started calling again , leaving repeated messages. I also sent another email to Mochizuki.
Finally, on Monday afternoon, Mochizuki called me back, but I was in a meeting and could not take the call. I returned that call and left several more messages that afternoon.
On Tuesday I started over with both Mochizuki and Wofford. Mochizuki called me back about noon yesterday.
Mochizuki confirmed the opening date, told me the opening time, and then asked me to tell her “again” which media organization I represented. I told her I was a citizen who did a blog, and she said I had to talk with Customer Service rather than her.
Mochizuki then asked that I not quote her by name. I told her I would not agree to that.
She confirmed that the Oconee County store will be the first for Trader Joe’s in Georgia and outside Atlanta, where the company operates six stores. She also told me that the normal business hours would be from 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. daily.
I asked her if the store would be localized in any way, and she said there would be paintings at the front of the story that were local.
I next called Customer Service, and someone named Amy answered. She would not give her last name.
She told me she could not confirm the opening date of the store other than that it would be by the end of the year. She said the opening would be posted on the Trader Joe’s web site when it was finalized.
I asked her if the store would be any different from the ones in Atlanta, and she said the stores were decorated locally. To whom the store makes donations is determined locally, she said.
She said there would be no local product differentiation, though the stores do vary somewhat by region.
The Banner-Herald story said the store would be located at 1850 Epps Bridge parkway, which is the address for the Markets at Epps Bridge shopping center. The story didn’t mention the Markets at Epps Bridge by name or any of the nearby stores.
The story did mention that the store’s employees dress in Hawaiian shirts.
Wofford was wearing a green, white and black print shirt with a complex design when he appeared before the BOC.
+++
I made a mistake in an earlier version of this report. I said that the Banner-Herald reported the opening date to be Sept. 29. It did not. The paper had the opening date right. I called Trader Joe's simply to confirm what the paper had reported. I apologize to Erin France of the paper, who was kind enough to point out the error to me.
The Oconee County Board of Education this evening officially selected Wayne Bagley from among three finalists to fill the Post 5 position on the Board left vacant when Tom Breedlove resigned on May 10 and moved out of state.
The announcement brings to an end a lengthy selection process that first saw the Board attempt to fill the vacancy from among the four announced candidates for other positions on the Board and then switch to an open competition that brought in 17 applicants.
The official selection of Bagley this evening came after the Board voted to go into executive session at the end of its regular meeting, which started at 4:30 p.m. at the school system’s administrative offices at 34 School street in Watkinsville
Bagley and Burnette attended the meeting and stayed after the regular meeting ended at 5:30, though no official indication had been given that an announcement was to be made.
After about five minutes in executive session, the Board returned to the meeting room.
Board Chairman David Weeks asked for the agenda of the meeting to be modified so the Board could announce the selection of the Post 5 member.
Weeks then nominated Bagley, who was supported by the three other Board members.
Weeks told Bagley he didn’t know “whether to wish you good luck or to tell you to run for the hills right now. But you are on it. So congratulations to you.”
Superintendent John A. Jackson gave me a prepared press release as soon as the announcement was made, and the announcement was put onto the school system web site after the meeting.
“At the end of the day, Mr. Bagley represented the best of some attractive choices in filling this important position,” the news release quotes Weeks as saying. “We were thankful to have three strong finalists from an impressive field of applicants for the appointment.”
Bagley is vice president of development for Lassiter Properties, Inc. Based in Morrow, southeast of Atlanta, Lassiter owns and operates timberlands in the U.S.
Bagley holds a bachelor’s degree in finance from the University of Georgia and a master’s degree from West Georgia College.
Bagley will fill out the term of Breedlove, which runs through 2012.
At least one more new face will join the Board after the November elections. Mack Guest was defeated in the July Republican primary by Mark Thomas.
Thomas faces Democrat Carter Strickland on the November ballot.
Oconee County Commissioner Chuck Horton tried last night to get Commission Chairman Melvin Davis to engage in a conversation about a recent proposal before the Policy Council of the Association County Commissioners of Georgia that would have altered how counties change the powers of the chairman.
Davis refused.
While Horton was speaking, Davis shuffled papers on his desk, looked down, and at one point even turned his back briefly on Horton, the other commissioners and the public.
Horton asked Davis to explain his role in creation of the ACCG document. Davis parried.
Davis is a member of the General Government Committee of ACCG, which presented the proposal to the Policy Council. He also is chairman of the Policy Council, though he left the room on Sept. 20 when the provision was discussed
Davis will assume the presidency of ACCG in late April or early May, at the annual conference of ACCG.
Horton had put the ACCG proposal on the agenda for last night’s meeting and began by saying he was surprised a couple of weeks ago when someone tipped him off to the proposed change. He said he and commissioners John Daniell, Margaret Hale and Jim Luke immediately registered their objections.
In August of 2009, the BOC passed an ordinance that changed the organizational chart for Oconee County. The new chart has Administrative Officer Alan Theriault and Finance Director Jeff Benko reporting to the full five-member board, rather than only to the chairman, as had been true in the past.
Davis objected to the change, which passed with the support of the other four commission members.
Horton said he thinks the proposed ACCG policy, which would give the state legislature more control over changes in local government structure, is at odds with what was done locally.
“If you knew about this and had anything to do with it and didn’t notify us, I find that disturbing,” Horton said to Davis.
“If you want to make a comment, I would hope that you didn’t have anything to do with it,” Horton said. “But if you did, I wish you had told us. If you were supporting this or had anything to do with it, it does upset me.”
Davis busied himself with his paper shuffling until Horton stopped speaking.
“The only comment I would make,” Davis said, “is that, as you pointed out, the policy committee struck that from the policy platform and the president of ACCG is appointing, as I understand it, an ad hoc committee to review all sides of the discussion.”
Commissioner John Daniell said he thought the Policy Council did the right thing in striking the provision. The other two commissioners did not speak.
County Attorney Daniel Haygood said his interpretation of the proposed change is that it would not affect Oconee County under any circumstance.
The proposal was under the heading “Home Rule: Changing Duties of the Chairman” and followed another item in the document called “Districting: Home Rule.” Both are on page 14 of the document.
Haygood said he interpreted the provision as applying only to a Home Rule provision of the state constitution, though the document itself does not specify that, and both sections with the “Home Rule” title deal with general issues of local governance.
The “Changing Duties of the Chairman” provision said that the state legislature should pass legislation to stipulate that any changes to the duties of the chairman could not be made until a new chairman is elected, that one or more public hearings had to be held before the changes could take place, and that changes had to be approved by a vote of the citizenry that had been authorized by the state General Assembly.
Davis looked at Haygood and nodded in agreement as Haygood made his argument that the provision was more limited than Horton and Daniell stated.
Haygood said Oconee County last year had merely specified powers of the chairman and the Board that had not been specified in the past.
The whole exchange last night on the ACCG proposal took 8 minutes and 20 seconds and came late in the two-hour long meeting.
Earlier the commissioners gave a weak endorsement to an invitation from the Northeast Georgia Regional Commission that Oconee join with NEGRC to create a Local Agriculture Protection Guide.
NEGRC is looking for a single county from the 12-county region to serve as the pilot community for the project. NEGRC will select the county based on “demonstrated need for farmland protection, support of elected officials, and availability of staff to work with NEGRC.”
County Strategic and Long-Range Planning Director Wayne Provost lead a discussion of the request, which was supported strongly by local farm protection advocate Russ Page.
The Board expressed reservations about joining with NEGRC on the project out of fear it might lead to some restrictions on what the county does to promote development in the county in the future.
In the end, the vote was unanimous to make application, though Provost was told to come back to the Board if he felt any of the provisions were becoming onerous.
The Board also gave the first reading to an ethics ordinance and put it on the agenda for its next meeting, which is scheduled for Oct. 12.
I was the only person who offered public comment on the proposed ordinance.
I asked Haygood if a person filing an ethics complaint against a commissioner would have protection against being sued for libel or slander as a result of the action. This protection exists for a person filing a suit in court.
Haygood said it is his belief that the complainant would not have such protection. And journalists or citizens who wrote about the complaint also would not have the usual protection against libel that exists when they write about court documents and proceedings.
The BOC also reviewed and tentatively approved new bylaws for Keep Oconee County Beautiful Commission. The bylaws specify that the Keep Oconee County Beautiful Commission will work with a county department to prepare a budget for presentation to the BOC.
Esther Porter, executive director of KOCBC, had asked earlier that the organization be allowed create its own budget request and bring it to the BOC. At present, KOCBC is housed in the Public Works Department.
The BOC put the bylaws on the consent agenda for the Oct. 12 meeting, meaning they will be approved without comment unless a commissioner asks that they be brought off the consent agenda for further discussion.
With considerable enthusiasm, the Board put on the consent agenda the alcohol license application of Trader Joe’s, to be located at 1850 Epps Bridge Parkway.
“Don’t run out of stock,” Horton told Philip Wofford, who represented Trading Joe’s at the meeting.
The Oconee County Board of Commissioners is scheduled to take up at its agenda-setting meeting tomorrow night a proposal that was pulled from the platform of the Association County Commissioners Georgia on Sept. 20 and that would make it harder for county governments to change the duties of the board chairman in the future.
Commissioner Chuck Horton asked that the item be placed on the agenda because “this has real strong implications not just to Oconee County but to every county in the state.”
Horton joined Oconee County commissioners John Daniell, Margaret Hale and Jim Luke in asking the Policy Council of ACCG to remove the proposal from it platform, and the Council did so.
In a paragraph headed “Home Rule: Changing Duties of the Chairman,” the proposed ACCG county platform said that the state legislature should pass legislation to stipulate that any changes to the duties of the chairman could not be made until a new chairman is elected, that one or more public hearings had to be held before the changes could take place, and that changes had to be approved by a vote of the citizenry that had been authorized by the state General Assembly.
The Oconee County BOC changed the county’s organizational chart in August of 2009 so that County Administrative Officer Alan Theriault and Budget Director Jeff Benko report to the full board, rather than only to Davis, as had been true in the past.
In the new chart, all other department heads report to Theriault, rather than to Davis.
The BOC had not approved the organizational chart that existed before the change, and it is not a part of the enabling legislation for the county.
Davis opposed the changes, which were approved unanimously by the other four members of the Commission.
ACCG President Lamar Paris and General County Government Policy Committee Chairman Roger Boatright will name a committee to further discuss the issue, and it could come up again in the future, according to Beth Brown, ACCG director of communications.
Horton (right) said he wants to talk about what happened and about the implication of the ACCG platform for the county.
Both The Oconee Enterprise and the Athens Banner-Herald have written about the Macon meeting, focusing on the disagreement of Daniell, Hale, Horton and Luke with the proposal.
Neither of the papers indicated exactly how the proposed change got into the draft of the ACCG County Platform.
Brown told me in a telephone conversation today that the proposed policy change came from the General County Government Committee of ACCG and was joined with recommendations from the five other committees to form the ACCG County Platform.
Oconee County Board of Commissioners Chairman is a member of the General County Government Committee.
Brown told me she didn’t know where within the committee the proposed change originated.
I sent Davis an email message at 10:40 this morning asking:
“Is it correct to say that you initiated the ACCG platform proposal on Home Rule that was subsequently pulled from the platform? That seems to be the assumption, and I wanted to give you the chance to clarify.”
Davis wrote me back at 6:40 this evening saying:
“Please give me a call in the next couple of days so we can discuss. I recently had a similar conversation with Erin from the ABH.”
If Davis told her the answer to my question, she didn’t report it today.
Davis also is chairman of the Policy Council, though Brown sent me an email message saying that Davis “left the room during the discussion of the entire General County Government section” of the Platform.
Hale also is a member of the General County Government Committee, but she told me tonight she did not attend the last meeting of that group in Savannah in April and learned of the proposed change only just before the Sept. 20 Policy Council meeting in Macon.
The agenda for the meeting tomorrow night, which will begin at 7 p.m. at the county courthouse, contains a number of other interesting items.
The county is scheduled to take up an invitation from the Northeast Georgia Regional Commission that the county join with NEGRC to create a Local Agriculture Protection Guide.
NEGRC is looking for a single county from the 12-county region to serve as the pilot community for the project. NEGRC will select the county based on “demonstrated need for farmland protection, support of elected officials, and availability of staff to work with NEGRC.”
Oconee County has a farmland protection program and has set aside money in the current Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax to fund it.
County Strategic and Long-Range Planning Director Wayne Provost will lead the discussion of the NEGRC solicitation.
It also will discuss revised by-laws for the Keep Oconee County Beautiful Commission, which has asked the county to remove it from the Public Works Department and let it report directly to the BOC.
It also will review two in what has become a long list of alcohol license applications. One of those to be reviewed tomorrow night comes from AA Trading Group on Macon highway.
The other comes from Trader Joe’s on Epps Bridge parkway.
Part of the suspense for the latter is whether “Two Buck Chuck Wine” will be offered. Some Trader Joe’s stores around the country offer a bottle of Charles Shaw wine for as low as $1.99.
What started out back in May as a plan by the Oconee County Board of Commissioners to save about $20,000 to balance the current budget turned on Tuesday night into a discussion among the commissioners about spending $2 million to renovate the Government Annex building on Greensboro road on the south of Watkinsville.
Billed in the legal notice as a chance for the public to comment on the “Oconee County Government Annex Renovation Project,” the Tuesday night meeting instead featured a discussion among the commissioners of the merits of three renovation plans for the annex facility, and a discussion of alternatives.
The most expensive of the three plans presented ran to just less than $1.9 million.
That did not include replacement of the leaking roof on the Annex building, estimated to cost an additional $350,854 to $396,128, or a proposed brick veneer, estimated to cost $25,728, or a new entrance canopy, estimated to cost $41,648.
It also didn’t cover unestimated costs for moving the existing county offices out of the building on Jan. 3, 2011, or back in on July 1, 2011, or expenses for housing the offices in the interim.
For the approximately 40 citizens in attendance, listening in on the discussion among the commissioners was difficult, as no one was using microphones, the commissioners sat with their backs to the audience and often talked at the same time among themselves, and the person who was moderating did little.
At one point, Commissioner Margaret Hale told the audience not to worry about the expenses, since none of the discussions involved a proposed tax increase.
Instead, she said, the county was going to be dipping into unspent monies from the 2003 Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax, which ended last year and was replaced by a new Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax. Both taxes added one cent per dollar to purchases made at businesses in the county.
How to spend that unspent sales tax revenue, designated as for county facility expansion and renovation, has been a central question haunting the commissioners for nearly two years.
The county started collecting the tax back in 2004, without, it now seems, any firm plans for how the money was to be spent.
County Finance Director Jeff Benko told me on Thursday that the county has not spent $4,083,067.69 of the $4.6 million originally approved for facility expansion and renovation. He said he was not subtracting from the $4.6 million figure spending approved by the commissioners for the fiscal year that started on July 1.
Keeping up with what has and has not been spent is a challenge.
On May 5, those plans were put on hold after Finance Director Benko proposed that the county vacate the Courthouse Annex, located across Main street in downtown Watkinsville from the courthouse, as a way to save money to balance the 2011 Fiscal Year budget.
The idea was that the county could move the Planning Department, Code Enforcement, and other offices from the Courthouse Annex to the Government Annex if the latter were renovated to accommodate the new as well as the current tenants.
The county leases the Courthouse Annex, and it has a lease only through the end of this calendar year.
Benko said in May that terminating the lease would save the county $41,675 in the current fiscal year. After a challenge by Commissioner Jim Luke, who said the savings would not be so great given moving and associated costs, the figure to be saved this year was reduced to $20,000.
The lease costs the county $6,942 per month, or $83,311 per year, according to Benko. In addition, the county pays what Benko calls “associated costs” for such things as utilities, insurance, pest control, and lawn maintenance, bringing the estimated annual cost to $105,000.
That money would be saved in future years if the county vacated the Courthouse Annex, the two-building complex also referred to as the Dolvin property.
The conversations inside the BOC about the Government Annex, the Courthouse Annex, and future county courthouse needs have been made even more hard to follow by conversations outside the BOC but instigated by it.
Back in December of 2008, at the initiation of BOC Chairman Melvin Davis, the county held an unpublicized meeting with a group of elected county officials to begin discussions about future courthouse facilities
The outcome of that meeting was a recommendation to the full BOC from county Strategic and Long-Range Planning Director Wayne Provost on March 31 of 2009 that the county issue a request for proposals for "architectural consulting services for county judicial and governmental administrative facilities."
The consultant was to study current space and needs and recommend to the BOC how to go forward with plans for new courthouse facilities.
The four members of the BOC bulked, however, and sent the issue to the Citizen Advisory Committee on Land Use and Transportation Planning.
After deliberating for nearly a year, that group decided on March 9 of this year that the county needed to build a new judicial facility separate from the current courthouse but near the new jail on Experiment Station road on the north of Watkinsville.
The Land Use Committee has spent most of its meetings since then working on a PowerPoint presentation it wants to show to citizens to convince them that it has reached the right decision.
After emphasizing that a new judicial facility was not something that was going to happen in the near term, the BOC on Aug. 31 told the Land Use Committee to go ahead with its presentation.
That meeting is now scheduled for 7 p.m. on Oct. 19 at the Civic Center on Hog Mountain road, where the discussion on Tuesday night about the Government Annex was held.
The Land Use Committee discussions have been vague about how its plans could be realized, but Finance Director Benko made specific reference to the unspent 2003 SPLOST funds back in September of 2009 when he met with committee members.
How much SPLOST money is available at any given point is difficult for anyone but Benko actually to know.
Although the county has not spent the $170,000 it set aside for renovation of Government Annex in February, it has approved spending from the $4.1 million in the SPLOST balance since the fiscal year began.
On July 6, it approved hiring Wayne Wilbanks to serve as project manager for the Government Annex renovations.
The amount to be paid to Wilbanks was not announced in the public meetings. Benko told me on Thursday that the county is paying him $100 per hour and covering his travel to and from his home outside the county at the rate of $0.50 per mile.
As of Thursday, Benko told me via an email message, the county had paid Wilbanks $21,376.25.
On Aug. 3, the BOC agreed to pay Precision Planning Inc. of Lawrenceville up to $74,500 for architectural services for the Government Annex renovation. As of Thursday, according to Benko, the county had paid PPI $6,183.50, but he said he is expecting another invoice shortly.
On Aug. 31, the BOC agreed to hire R.W. Allen of Augusta as the construction manager at risk for the renovation and to pay up to $2,990 for initial services. As of Thursday, Benko said, he had not yet paid any money to R.W. Allen.
At the meeting on Tuesday night, Chairman Melvin Davis introduced Wilbanks, who then introduced representatives of both PPI and R.W. Allen to the audience. Wilbanks stayed at the front of the room and led the discussion of three renovation plans offered by PPI. R.W. Allen submitted cost estimates for two of those.
I was not able to attend the meeting on Tuesday night. Sarah Bell video recorded it for me.
Wilbanks identified the first plan created as a “Schematic Workstation Plan.” Department heads would have offices on the exterior walls of the building. Much of the remaining space would be used for open cubicles. Total square footage was 20,160, or the size of the building as it is now.
R.W. Allen said that design would cost $1,436,408 to complete.
After getting staff feedback, Wilbanks said, PPI next proposed a “Schematic Office Plan.” This included individual offices and a total square footage of 23,660.
R.W. Allen estimated the cost of this design to be $1,885,505.
Wilbanks said PPI got more staff feedback and offered a third plan, called “Schematic Plan.” It does not specify the square footage.
R.W. Allen has not yet given a cost estimate for this plan.
At the meeting, Wilbanks said he would put the schematics for the three plans on the county web site, and they are available there now.
Both the Athens Banner-Herald and The Oconee Enterprise covered the Tuesday meeting. In both cases, the papers focused on the reaction of the commissioners to the cost estimates.
Commissioner Luke has been opposed to the plan to move from the Courthouse Annex from the beginning, and he remained so on Tuesday. Commissioner John Daniell has been the biggest proponent of the renovation, and he reiterated that position on Tuesday.
He said that the county currently is using only about three-quarters of the 10,000 square feet it is leasing in the Courthouse Annex and that the proposed renovation plans, which are expected to meet space needs for the next 10 years, are a good investment.
The Oconee Welcome Center actually vacated some of the Courthouse Annex space this week, moving to newly rented space on Main street next to the courthouse.
The BOC agreed on Aug. 3 to a three-year lease of that space at $900 per month. The money will come from the county’s hotel tax revenues.
Commissioner Hale and Commissioner Chuck Horton expressed concern Tuesday with the cost estimates for the Government Annex renovations, which they said surprised them.
“We went from renovating the inside to the Taj Mahal,” Hale said. “I really think we went to the extreme. That wasn’t my intent.”
Alan Theriault, county administrative officer, told me on Thursday that he sent an email message to the commissioners on Sept. 15 informing them that the materials for Tuesday night’s meeting were available for review.
Luke suggested, given the cost, that the county should consider a new building, perhaps in front of the current building. Chairman Davis ended the meeting by asking Wilbanks to come back to the Commission after exploring that option.
Citizens who wanted to speak at the meeting had to shout out their questions, since Wilbanks focused his attention on the reactions of the commissioners, who were seated immediately in front of him.
Several citizens did speak, and the lack of space in the renovated facility for the Athens Technical College adult education program was a key concern.
Nancy Turnbill, director of that program, pointed out that the county web site lists the Adult Learning Center on its web directory, but it is not included in the renovation plans.
Commissioner Daniell said the county could find space somewhere else for the adult education program.
If the BOC goes forward with the proposals on the table for renovation of the Government Annex, it also is going to be shopping for short-term space for the Utility Department, the Public Works Department and the Fire Department.
And that $20,000 savings from vacating the Courthouse Annex is gone.
The Oconee County Board of Commissioners is scheduled to give first reading on Sept. 28 to an ethics ordinance, revised since it was first proposed back in April to decrease the influence of the BOC on appointment of an Ad Hoc Board of Ethics to hear ethics complaints against commissioners.
The ordinance sets forth general ethical standards for county commissioners and specifies behaviors that are prohibited in 19 separate categories.
The ordinance stipulates that commissioners shall not have an interest in any contracts or transactions affected by their actions, attempt to influence a county officer making country purchases, withhold information from county boards or departments, or make unauthorized use of county property.
Any commissioner with an interest in any proposed ordinance, resolution or other action before the board of commissioners is required to immediately disclose publicly the nature and extent of the interest.
Commissioners found in violation of the ethics ordinance could receive a warning, censure or reprimand, be made to make repayment to the county for any unjust enrichment, be asked to resign and be referred to criminal authorities for prosecution.
The proposed ordinance states that anyone can initiate action against a commissioner by submitting a written complaint to the county clerk.
Each complain will be reviewed initially by the county attorney to determine if it involves a commissioner.
Complaints involving a commissioner are to be immediately forwarded to a Special Master, an attorney to be appointed by the BOC once the ordinance has passed.
Complaints then move to an Ad Hoc Board of Ethics, which is appointed when a complaint that is filed is considered by the Master to have merit.
What is changed is the composition of the Ad Hoc Board of Ethics.
In the ordinance now before the Commission, the Ad Hoc Board is created by the Special Master, the Oconee County Probate Judge and the Oconee County Chief magistrate after soliciting applications and recommendations from the citizens of the county.
Originally, the Special Master alone made the appointments. The ordinance stipulated that the Master would solicit recommendations only from the county bar association, the state bar association, the county Chamber of Commerce, the county Board of Elections and Registration, elected county officials, and the Board of Education.
Given that the Special Master was an appointment of the BOC, the BOC retained considerable control over composition of the Ad Hoc Board of Ethics. The revised ordinance dilutes that influence somewhat. The probate judge is an elected official. The magistrate court judge is appointed in Oconee County by the BOC.
Other changes in the ordinance proposed back in April cleaned up the language and corrected a numbering problem.
Commissioner John Daniell (above) spearheaded the efforts to create the ethics ordinance, which was drafted by County Attorney Daniel Haygood and modeled at least in part on a Draft Model Ethics Ordinance for Counties prepared by the Association County Commissioners of Georgia.
Norris, a member of the Board of Directors of North Georgia Bank, had been criticized for not recusing himself from votes involving developers doing business with the bank.
The ordinance before the BOC on Sept. 28 would give citizens a mechanism for making complaints of the sort voiced against Norris and for having the complaint considered by citizens in the county.
The Oconee County Cycling Organization was sent home tonight without its Share the Road signs when the Land Use and Transportation Planning Committee decided to postpone further discussion of the signage until it has information on the legal implications of telling bicyclists and motorists to ride together.
The cycling organization asked the Committee back in July to recommend that the county install Share the Road signs on Colham Ferry road from Watkinsville to Watson Spring Mill road, on Simonton Bridge road from Watkinsville to the county line, on New High Shoals road from U.S. 441 to SR 186, and on Barnett Shoals road from Watkinsville to the county line.
The Committee delayed discussion of the request until tonight, in part so it could ask Emil Beshara, director of the Public Works Department, his opinion of the request.
Beshara left little doubt that he is not in favor of the signs, saying that he was afraid that they would indicate an endorsement by the county of biking on the roads, possibly leading to legal liability should there be an accident.
“I have reservations about putting signs on heavily traveled roads, on narrow roads, on roads with a speed limit above 35 miles per hour,” Beshara said. “I personally have reservations about the possible perception of endorsement of cycling along these routes.”
Beshara stressed that bicyclists and motorists have the same right to the roadway.
“Much to many people’s dismay, bicyclists have the legal right to use our roadways, just as much of a right as a car,” he said.
None of the eight committee members present expressed much support for the request, and several, most prominent among them Frank Watson, were openly hostile.
“I have friends who complain to me all the time about bicyclists and holding up traffic,” he said. He added that he also felt “BikeAthens has a little bit to do” with the request and he didn’t like that.
Watson made the motion to delay any action until the Committee had more information on the legal implications of putting up the signage. The motion passed 7 to 1. (The committee has 14 members, but only eight members showed up for the meeting.)
Richard McSpadden, a member of the Committee and president of the OCCO, was not present, and Tony Glenn made the pitch for the signs in his absence.
Glenn said OCCO selected the four roads because its members indicated they use them extensively, often to reach other roadways in the county with less traffic.
The Committee will not take up the signage request again until at least November. Watson will not be on the Committee then, since his term ended tonight and he did not seek reappointment.
Any action taken by the Committee would be advisory to the Board of Commissioners, which would make the final decision.
In October, the Committee plans to devote its meeting to a public pitch for its recommendation that the county separate the county judicial and administrative facilities and build a new judicial facility near the county jail.
The exact date for that presentation has not yet been set.
