First Chance to Comment
Nine individuals came forward last night to express opinions on and ask questions about a proposed ordinance that would change the way the Oconee County Board of Commissioners interacts with administrators and department heads who run the county day-to-day.
Some of those taking a position were supportive of the ordinance, and some were critical.
Mary Mellein, who has been active in local politics, questioned whether the full board efficiently could handle hiring and firing of the administrative officer and finance director, as is proposed in the ordinance. At present, the administrative officer and finance director report only to the chairman of the Board of Commissioners.
Chuck Williams, president of North Georgia Bank and chair of the Oconee County Development Authority, also expressed doubts that the proposed changes would improve the operation of the county.
Charles Baugh, president of Citizens for Oconee’s Future, spoke in favor of the ordinance, which was drafted by County Attorney Daniel Haygood after lengthy discussions over the last 10 months about the power of the chairman and the others members of the commission.
The chairman both runs the meetings of and votes on issues before the commission in case of a tie and is the chief executive of the county. Baugh applauded the four commissioners for their work to strengthen their role in county governance.
At one point during the meeting, Commissioner Margaret Hale restated emphatically her position that Chairman Melvin Davis has withheld information from the commission during his nearly nine years in office, making it difficult for the commissioners to function effectively.
Chairman Davis responded by unpacking a box he had brought to the meeting, saying it contained documents he had given to the commission recently. "Communication is a two way street," he said.
Sarah Bell, who ran unsuccessfully against Davis in the Republic primary in July of 2008, also supported the ordinance. I also spoke in favor of the ordinance but asked that it be modified to eliminate the section specifying duties of the chairman. I said I did not believe the existing enabling legislation gave the commissioners the right to limit the chairman acting as chief executive officer of the county.
The public comments followed the first reading of the ordinance by Haygood. The public also will be given a second chance to comment at the next agenda setting meeting of the commission, which starts at 7 p.m. on July 28 at the courthouse.
The second reading of the ordinance, and final action, is scheduled for the next regular meeting of the commission on Aug. 4.
The ordinance and supporting documents are available on the county web site. The video recording of last night’s meeting is available on the official county site on Vimeo.