Oconee County's Support for Interbasin Water Transfer Not Shared By All

Grabbing for Water

Oconee County Board of Commissioners Chairman Melvin Davis told those attending the town hall meeting last week that the county is continuing to explore the possibility of selling water from the Apalachee River to metro-Atlanta to help meet that area’s water needs.

What Davis did not say was that the county would need a change to state legislation to make it possible for the county to even enter into such an agreement, as current state law bans such a transfer of water to metro-Atlanta.

And he didn’t say that his openness to transferring water from the Oconee River basin to meet metro-Atlanta’s needs is at odds with the position being taken by many outside Atlanta who are guarding their water resources against what is being termed a potential "water grab" by Atlanta.

At the town hall meeting, the five commissioners were asked what their concerns were as the Georgia General Assembly debates how to address the water needs of Atlanta following the ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Paul A. Magnuson that metro-Atlanta has been illegally withdrawing water from Lake Lanier.

The judge ruled last summer that, unless Congress approves a change in restrictions on water withdrawal from the lake, northeast Georgia must return to levels of water withdrawal from the 1970s.

In response to the town-hall question, Oconee Commissioners Margaret Hale and Chuck Horton expressed caution about transfer of water from the Apalachee to metro-Atlanta, with Hale saying "I can assure you I’m going to fight very hard that they do not come in and take the resources we need to move into the future."

Davis’ response to the question was considerably more positive.

"We have expressed about the potential of utilization of that water up until the time it is needed for Oconee County for perhaps other jurisdictions and our selling that water," he said.

According to Jill Johnson, program director for Georgia Conservation Voters, none of the legislation she knows of that is currently being considered by the Georgia General Assembly would authorize transfer of water out of the Oconee River basin to metro-Atlanta.

Oconee and Walton counties are partnering on construction of the Hard Labor Creek Reservoir in Walton County. Financing of the project has been made more difficult by the drought and the housing market collapse, both of which have adversely affected water sales.

Oconee County residents were told that the costs of the county’s participation in the project would be covered by the sale of water to new customers, and that seems unlikely at present.

Ultimately, general county tax revenues could have to be diverted to the project to cover costs.

Officials from the two counties have been exploring the possibility that the state would cover some of the construction costs in return for an agreement to transfer water to metro-Atlanta.

Johnson said she doubts that monies will be allocated for that purpose in this legislative session.

Johnson told me her assessment of the current legislative climate between sessions of the Georgia River Network Conference on Jekyll Island this weekend.

Interbasin transfers of water, which is what the county would be engaged in if it sold water to metro-Atlanta, were strongly criticized at the two-day conference.

The most likely recipient of the Apalachee River water would be Gwinnett County, which currently draws all of its drinking water from Lake Lanier.

According to Johnson, current state law forbids the 15-counties that make up the Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District from engaging in new transfers of water from outside that district. Gwinnett is part of that group.

Gov. Sonny Perdue has submitted water legislation to the state House and Senate, but it does not allow for interbasin transfers, Johnson said. Other legislation also is being proposed, but none, as far as she knows, would allow Oconee and Walton to sell water to metro-Atlanta.

Walton County had been a part of the district Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District, but it withdrew when it worked out the agreement with Oconee County on Hard Labor Creek.

Walton is in two watersheds, the Oconee and the Ocmulgee. Water would be drawn from the Apalachee River, which runs between Walton and Oconee Counties, to fill the reservoir in southeastern Walton County.

Hard Labor Creek is a tributary to the Apalachee, so unless water transferred to the more urbanized western part of Walton County is transferred back after use, the Oconee watershed will lose water as a result of the two-county partnership even without the transfer to metro-Atlanta.

I attended the meeting on Jekyll Island because I had been selected by the Georgia River Network as the 2010 Volunteer of the Year Award recipient. The group cited my work as founder of Friends of Barber Creek and this blog in making the award.

I received the award at a ceremony on Friday night, the end of the first day of the conference.

More than 100 people from around the state attended the conference, and interbasin transfers were a frequent topic during the sessions.

Participants, in fact, were urged to sign the No Water Grabs petition being organized by the Georgia Water Coalition, a collection of groups around the state interested in water quality. The Georgia River Network and Friends of Barber Creek are members.

Neill Herring, a lobbyist for the Sierra Club with the Georgia legislature, summarized the mood of the state about interbasin transfers this way: "People outside the area of Atlanta are aware that their resource is under siege."

Jenny Hoffner, director of the Atlanta office of American Rivers, a national advocacy group for rivers, was among several speakers at the Georgia River Network conference raising questions about reservoir construction under any circumstance.

"Dams kill rivers and kill wetlands," she said, "And they cost a lot of money."

She advocated increased focus on conservation, noting that both Seattle and Boston have reduced water consumption in recent years despite growth in population.

The Oconee County BOC considered other reservoir sites before voted 3-2 in 2007 to join Walton County on Hard Labor Creek. Commissioners Hale and Horton voted against the partnership.

None of the discussion at the time focused on alternatives to building a new reservoir.

Jekyll Island Beauty

Oconee County Town Hall Meeting Draws Crowd Concerned about Mitigation and Elder Mill Bridge

Planting Seeds

More than 60 people showed up at the Civic Center tonight to voice support for preservation of land around the Elder Mill Bridge and for a mitigation resolution before the county. They also expressed concerns about a wide range of issues from taxes to a need for community gardens.

The five commissioners showed little to no support for creation of a county park around the covered bridge on Elder road in the southeastern part of the county, though they did support purchasing and preserving Elder Mill, just down Rose Creek from the bridge, should that come on the market.

Board members were more receptive to the mitigation resolution that would put the county on record with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as favoring mitigation in the county or upstream from the county when the Corps issues permits for destruction of streams and wetlands in the county.

The Board members also expressed reservations about the resolution, with Chairman Melvin Davis saying he is worried about “unintended consequences” for development and Commissioner John Daniell saying he was not sure the resolution goes far enough.

More than 20 persons spoke at the session, and seven spoke in favor of the mitigation resolution after I asked each of the commissioners to state where she or he preferred that mitigation be done when county streams are damaged.

All five of the commissioners said they preferred restoration upstream or in the county, consistent with the language of the resolution itself.

I introduced the mitigation resolution to the county last spring, but the board has taken no action on it.

Russ Page, long-time advocate for a park at the Elder Mill Bridge, spoke first and asked the members if they were willing to take action to preserve the area.

Commissioner Jim Luke said the proposal for the park back in 2007 “scared me to death” because of its scope, and Chairman Davis once again said the county simply did not have money for the project.

Davis acknowledged, however, that the county spent nearly $1 million on park improvements elsewhere in the county in the last five years.

Despite the lack of funds, Luke said, if the mill comes on the market, “we’ll find a way to protect the mill.”

One questioner asked Commissioner Daniell and Commissioner Margaret Hale about the upcoming elections. The term for each expires this year, and Daniell and Hale said they planned to seek re-election.

Pat Priest suggested the county consider developing a community garden, and Commissioner Luke said he felt there was land available for that purpose in the county if someone came forward with a specific plan.

Stuart Cofer, owner of Cofer’s Home and Garden Store in Athens, said he would donate seeds for the project.

Bill Mayberry, active in anti-tax initiatives in the county, asked if the county would work more closely with the school board to reduce the tax burden in the county. The commissioners indicated they already were doing a number of things in this regard and were willing to do more.

The session lasted two hours, and many stayed for about a half hour afterwards to talk individually with the commissioners. The commissioners also engaged in informal conversation in the half hour before the formal session.

This was the second town-hall style meeting held by the commissioners in recent months. About 40 persons attended the first back in October.

I recorded the session and uploaded that recording to my Vimeo site.

Oconee County Had a Conceptual Plan for Elder Mill Park

What Could Have Been

Some Oconee County leaders envisioned a park around the historic Elder Mill Covered Bridge on Elder Mill road in the southeastern part of the county back in 2007 that included hiking and equestrian trails, a museum, a nature center and an interpretation center including Elder Mill itself.

John Gentry, director of the Oconee County Parks and Recreation Department, sent me an email message on Nov. 21, 2007, indicating that he was in discussion with Dr. Charles Morgan, owner of the mill, about the county’s possible purchase of the mill.

“The mill is the key to success with the BOC (Board of Commissioners),” Gentry wrote me.

A conceptual plan for the Elder Mill Park was drawn up by Williams and Associates, a local land planning firm, on June 13, 2007.

The north entrance to the park was on SR 15 at Elder road, and the south entrance was at the intersection of Elder and Saxon roads.

The park also incorporated the W. Joe Elder Cemetery, near the bridge.

The park museum and information center were to be housed at the home of Al Cuming, who lived at the historic covered bridge and was its protector and advocate. He allowed access across his property to the shoals just downstream of the bridge.

For reasons that have never been publicly divulged, the county never moved on the plan for the park, and all of the land remains in private hands.

The Cuming home is under contract to be sold, with closing expected later this week. Cuming no longer lives there.

I had spoken with and sent email to Gentry as the discussions of the park progressed back in 2007.

Gentry, who is now on leave serving in Afghanistan, never got back to me about the plans for the park after that Nov. 21 message.

The county owns the bridge, which spans Rose Creek, and it has a scenic preservation overlay district covering some of the land that was to serve as the core of the park, including the land where the Cuming home and the mill are located.

The county zoning code says the preservation district “is comprised of land which in the best interest of the citizens of Oconee County should remain in a natural state as nearly as possible.”

The only uses allowed in the Scenic Preservation District are “buildings and associated structures and digs which are necessary to the improvement, restoration, maintenance and scholarly study of such areas, so long as such buildings and associated structures and digs do not conflict with the intent of this Development Code to preserve the special character of these areas.”

The BOC discussed creating a park that would include the bridge and at least some surrounding property in a closed-door session on Sept. 4, 2007. No details of the discussion, which was in executive session, have been released to the public.

Even the Williams and Associates conceptual plan was not widely circulated.

At that Sept. 4 meeting, the BOC voted to continue to pursue a grant from the Georgia Land Conservation Program to help create the park, but the BOC refused to allocate any funds to support the application.

According to the historical marker at the Elder Bridge, it was built in 1897 and carried the Watkinsville-Athens road across Calls Creek. Today, Calls Creek flows through a culvert under the current SR15, which is the descendant of the Watkinsville-Athens road.

The 99-foot-long bridge was moved to its present location in 1924. The bridge is made entirely of wood, and its planks are held together with wooden pegs.

The grist mill, just downstream from the bridge, was built about 1900 and stopped operating in 1941, according to the marker at the bridge. It contains many of the original inner workings of the mill.

In an Aug. 23, 2007, letter to the commissioners, Gentry said there was $452,000 available in the 2003 SPLOST “that is not earmarked for any particular project at this time.”

Plans were to use the money for amenities in other county parks, and Gentry said that committing the funds to the Elder Mill Park would delay purchasing some of these items.

“My recommendation to you first and foremost is to fully support the conceptual plan” for the park, Gentry wrote.

It never happened.

Second Oconee County Town Hall Meeting Set for Tuesday Night

Lots to Discuss

If a crowd shows up at the Oconee County town-hall style meeting with members of the Board of Commissioners at 7 p.m. on Tuesday night at the Civic Center, it probably will be because of word-of-mouth and informal notification about the meeting.

The county did post a notice of the meeting on its website and on the bulletin board at the courthouse on Feb. 3, the same day it sent notices to The Oconee Enterprise, The Oconee Leader and the Athens Banner-Herald.

The county did not take out any advertisements in the three papers.

Neither of the two weeklies included the meeting it its calendar of upcoming events.

The Banner-Herald ran two very short stories. The first was two paragraphs long and was the second item in the Around Oconee cluster of short reports on page two of the Oconee Living insert to the paper on Feb. 10. A four-paragraph story appears on page B2 of today’s paper.

The Leader ran a 10-paragraph-long story on page 6 of its Feb. 11 edition.

Oconee County Clerk Gina Lindsey sent me an e-mail message on Friday morning confirming the county’s efforts to promote the meeting.

A little after 3 p.m. on Friday she sent another announcement of the meeting via e-mail to a list she maintains of media and interested citizens. Today’s Banner-Herald item was a rewrite of the announcement in that second mailing.

Wendell Dawson sent out a message to his listserv today and directed readers to his web site, on which he urged citizens to “Attend and speak up at Oconee Town Hall meeting on Tuesday, February 16, 2010 & take action to Lower Your Property Taxes.”

Dan Matthews also posted a note on his blog this morning saying that “I think it is very important that each and every one of us attend this town hall forum 7 p.m. Tuesday" and encouraged readers "to ask the Oconee County Board of Commissioners any question you want.”

The county held its first such meeting with citizens on Oct. 20, 2009, and about 40 people turned out for an hour-and-a-half-long exchange.

Neither of the weeklies made any reference to that town-hall meeting in the calendar listing in the Oct. 15 editions, and the county did not run advertisements.

According to a second document Lindsey sent out with her Friday afternoon email, Alan Theriault, administrative officer for the county, again will serve as moderator for the session.

Melvin Davis, chairman of the Board of Commissioners, is scheduled to begin the session with a “call to order and welcome” at 7 p.m.

The session is schedule to last two hours, and commissioners have promised to be available for informal conversation for a half hour before the call to order. The Civic Center is at 2661 Hog Mountain road, west of Butler’s Crossing and near the Oconee High School.

The four commissioners initiated the town-hall meetings as a way of improving communication with the citizenry, and Commissioner John Daniell was the one to first announce this meeting at the BOC agenda-setting meeting on Jan. 26, giving the precise time, date and venue.

Chairman Davis was a little flustered, and he responded: “It is at 7. I believe that is correct. Thanks. John.” Then we went immediately to the next time on the agenda.

Daniell also took the initiative in re-announcing the session a week later at the regular meeting on Feb. 2. Again, Davis’ response was brief.

“That is Feb. 16, 7 p.m., at the Civic Center, for the town hall meeting. Any other comments?” he said hurridly.

I reported on the first announcement in my report on the Jan. 26 meeting of the BOC, but the Enterprise did not mention it in three stories it ran on Jan. 28 about issues covered at that meeting.

The Banner-Herald ran a story on the meeting on Jan. 29, and it also did not mention the town-hall meeting.

The Leader does not cover BOC meetings and rarely writes about governmental issues in the county.

I also reported on the town hall meeting in my story on the Feb. 2 posting, but the Enterprise did not.

The Enterprise in its Feb. 11 edition did include an oblique reference to the town hall meeting in a story on the bottom of page A5 about a Greenways Master Plan discussion scheduled for 6 p.m. Tuesday at the community center in Veterans Park.

In the middle of the second paragraph, the story includes a direct quote, “A Commissioners’ Town Hall meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m. at the Civic Center also on Feb. 16,” but it gives no idea who was being quoted of why.

The Banner-Herald didn’t have a reporter at the Feb. 2 meeting, and it ran a short report on the meeting on the front page of the Oconee Living section on Feb. 10. It attributed the information to the circulated draft minutes from the county and did not mention the town-hall meeting in that story.

The Leader, once again, did not cover the meeting.

It seems likely that the county’s unwillingness to move forward with plans for creation of a park and protection of land around the history Elder Mill Bridge (above) will be a topic raised at the meeting on Tuesday.

The Enterprise gave some attention to this issue in its story about the Jan. 26 BOC meeting that appeared on page A12 of the Jan. 28 edition. The story was disjointed and hard to follow, but it did indicate in a nuetral way that two citizens, Russ Page and Robert Wyatt, expressed their disappointment that the county had not acted.

The paper gave further uncharacteristic coverage to someone who questioned the county when, in the Main Street column by Publisher Vinnie Williams on Feb. 4, it commented favorably on the color of the sweater Wyatt wore at the meeting. “Liked the daffodil-colored sweater that Dr. Bob Wyatt wore,” Williams wrote.

The future of the courthouse is likely to be another topic that will come up Tuesday.

The Citizen Advisory Committee for Land Use and Transportation Planning has been discussing this issue, and Dawson, a former BOC chairman, suggested in his blog posting today that this should be discussed.

I plan to bring up the resolution I introduced–but that the BOC has so far refused to discuss–that would put the county on record with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as favoring local stream and wetlands restoration when the Corps grants a permit for stream and wetland destruction in the county.

The county’s slowness in moving forward on the promised widening of Daniells Bridge road was raised at the last town hall meeting and might come up again Tuesday.

Other roadway projects that citizens might ask about could be the proposed four-laning of Simonton Bridge road and the proposed flyover from Daniells Bridge road to the roadway at Home Depot.

The county is just starting its budget process for the 2010-2011 fiscal year, and citizens might have questions and comments about county priorities.

An issues that is left over from last year is how the county cut back on the budget of the Keep Oconee County Beautiful Commission. That could come up again on Tuesday night.

Related to that is the reorganization plan the four commissioners put into place in August over the objection of Chairman Davis that gives the four commissioners more access to information from Administrator Theriault and Finance Director Jeff Benko.

Franklin Shumate suggested at the time he planned to make that an issue in the upcoming elections.

The terms of commissioners Daniell and Margaret Hale expire at end this year, and filing for candidates who wish to run as a party nominee begins on April 26 and ends at noon on April 30.

Independents file from June 28 to noon on July 2.

It is possible there will be hints of the election on Tuesday night.

NOTE: In the original version of this posting, I did not mention the story in the Feb. 11 issue of the Leader. Anna Dolianitis, a staff writer for the paper, sent me an email on Feb. 17 pointing out the error.

"While you were correct in that we did not run anything in our weekly calendar, we did print a story about it on Page 6 of our Feb. 11 issue (it is in a box near the middle of the page)," she wrote. "Since your post talked about how little publicity was given to the meeting, I thought it was worth mentioning that The Leader article about it showed up in 92 percent of Oconee mailboxes last Thursday."

She is correct. I somehow missed the story, and I apologize for the error.

Snow Highlights Beauty of Oconee County's Elder Mill Bridge

Snow at the Bridge

The 4 inches of snow that fell Friday night and Saturday early morning made access to the historic Elder Mill Bridge on Elder road in southeastern Oconee County treacherous.

I waited until the sun on Saturday made it possible for me to get out of my driveway and subdivision and headed immediately to the bridge. Elder road was still partially snow covered, but I was not the first to cross the bridge or even park in the visitor parking lot on the west side of the bridge.

When I parked my car, it was exactly noon, and while there were many footprints already on the path to the shoals, I was alone at the shoals and bridge for about 15 minutes.

When I left a half hour later, a carful of new visitors had arrived.

Here are some pictures for those not lucky enough to see the bridge, shoals of Rose Creek and Elder Mill on this beautiful Oconee County day of winter.

Oconee County Land Use Committee Chair Controls Meetings

I Wish I Knew

Abe Abouhamdan, chair of the Oconee County Citizen Advisory Committee on Land Use and Transportation Planning, runs a tight meeting.

His handling of the gathering of the group on Tuesday night illustrated that point well.

A seemingly mild-mannered guy with a soft voice, Abouhamdan started the meeting promptly at 7 p.m.--with a warning to the public.

"We have business to discuss," he said. The public should hold its comments to the section on the agenda for that purpose and limit those comments "to the items listed on the agenda," he added.

Abouhamdan passed out that agenda, which placed the public comments opportunity near the end--just ahead of the announcement of the time and place of the next meeting and of adjournment.

In case the public–and at that time, I was the only member of the public present–didn’t hear the admonition about holding comments and sticking to topic, Abouhamdan had it printed at the bottom of the agenda itself.

Abouhamdan then started into that agenda, but he stopped abruptly after getting approval of the minutes of the last meeting.

He had forgotten to introduce Jim Luke, a member of the Board of Commissioners, two members of the county staff, Blake Giles, editor of The Oconee Enterprise, and me. He acknowledged each of us--by name.

One other citizen arrived a few minutes later, as did a third staff member. They missed the chance to be introduced.

Abouhamdan is president & CEO of ABE Consulting, Inc., and he does contract work for the county, including on the design of the often-discussed but not-yet-realized widening of Daniells Bridge road.

He is in his second term as chairman of the 14-member committee, having been elected to that position by the members, who are appointed by the BOC.

Abouhamdan next turned to the discussion of the first item on the agenda, the future of the county courthouse.

He methodically outlined options, expressed his opinions about them, and let the individual members ask questions or make comments.

That agenda item exhausted (though without any agreement on what to do about the courthouse), Abouhamdan called for other business from committee members.

Richard McSpadden seized the opportunity to say he wanted to know the status of the mitigation resolution the Land Use and Transportation Planning Committee reviewed at its November 2009 meeting.

McSpadden added that he "saw something in the paper" about it.

The committee voted on Nov. 10 not to recommend the resolution to the BOC, and the BOC has not taken any action on the resolution.

The only thing that has been in any paper about this in 2010 was a letter I wrote (using my name) to the Athens Banner-Herald. The paper published the letter (with my name) on Feb. 3.

I also had introduced the resolution to the BOC, had lobbied the Land Use and Transportation Planning Committee to put it on its agenda, and had corresponded with Abouhamdan numerous times about it.

I did miss the November meeting when it was discussed because of a prior international commitment, but the resolution was presented to the committee by an attorney working with me. She told the committee she had written the resolution at my request.

Abouhamdan told McSpadden that as far has he knew, the resolution had not been addressed by the commissioners, but he was not certain.

He turned to Wayne Provost, county strategic and long range planner, who also said he didn’t know the status of the resolution.

"I wish I knew," Abouhamdan said apologetically as he brought the matter to a close.

Commissioner Luke, who certainly knew the answer, was still sitting at the back of the room, exactly where he had been when Abouhamdan introduced him earlier.

And I was still sitting exactly where I had been when Abouhamdan introduced me.

The next item on the agenda was citizen comment, and I stood and distributed to the committee a copy of a posting from this blog providing information on land for sale around the courthouse.

By my interpretation–and apparently by Abouhamdan’s–that was appropriate, given that the courthouse was listed on the agenda.

The mitigation resolution was not, and no one asked me about it.

Abouhamdan adjourned the meeting at 8:07 p.m., missing his stated goal of ending the meeting in an hour.

But he missed only slightly.

"The 'I wish I knew' Clip"

Discussion of Oconee County Courthouse Continues

Collecting the Dots

The Citizen Advisory Committee on Land Use and Transportation Planning spent a little more than an hour tonight once again discussing options for the county courthouse.

As was true last month, the discussion ended with Chairman Abe Abouhamdan saying that maybe next month–or maybe the month after–the committee would give its recommendation to the Board of Commissioners.

On March 31 of last year the BOC asked the citizen committee for advice on what the county should to do address future space needs for court and administrative functions of the county.

The Land Use and Transportation Planning Committee began discussion of the issue the next month and has devoted most of its monthly meetings since to the issue.

At tonight’s meeting Abouhamdan led the group through a discussion of the four options it listed at the January meeting: (1) Keep all government activities in one place, (2) Separate judicial and administrative activities, (3) Do nothing, and (4), Combine administrative operations with the Oconee County Board of Education.

Abouhamdan and Wayne Provost, the county administration’s liaison to the committee, argued that it would be advantageous to separate the court and administrative offices of the county.

Abouhamdan said it would be "a pretty expensive deal" to create a single facility, that it would "require a large tract," and that "some departments cannot be physically connected" to the courthouse because of equipment.

He mentioned Public Works as an example of an office that he felt could not be at the courthouse. Presently it is at the Government Annex south of downtown Watkinsville.

No support for the third option–doing nothing–was voiced, and board member Courtney Gale made a motion that the third option be dropped. Abouhamdan argued successfully against doing that because he wanted the record to reflect that it was discussed.

The fourth item was expanded to include retail space as well as space for the county schools and county government.

Abouhamdan said that would be "tremendous if it works," but he expressed doubt that land was available for that purpose.

Questions about the availability of land came up frequently during the meeting, and several committee members made reference during discussion of the fourth option to the decision by the Board of Education to purchase land on the north of downtown Watkinsville for future administrative offices.

Committee member Flynn Warren also said there was land available in downtown Watkinsville.

The committee agreed that it would rank the four options at the next meeting by placing "dots" next to them on a board at the front of the room. Each committee member would have a number of dots and would place the dots next to the options favored.

During the citizen comment period, at the very end of the meeting, I passed out printed copies of the story I posted here Sunday on land being offered for sale near the courthouse and on the land purchased by the BOE.

Abouhamdan then said the committee would continue its discussion next month, asked for a motion to adjourn, and ended the meeting.